Depression screens needed for teens

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


All teens should be screened for depression, even if they don’t necessarily show signs of the blues, an influential government panel is recommending, noting that the majority of afflicted teens aren’t diagnosed or treated even though there are effective therapies.

Kids ages 12 to 18 should be routinely screened for the mood disorder with standardized depression tests by their pediatrician or family doctor, the U.S. Preventative Task Force said today. The panel's new recommendation—an update of its 2002 assessment, when it said there wasn't enough evidence to advise such screening—is set to be published in next month's Pediatrics.

The task force, which tends to run conservative in its screening guidance, modified its advice after concluding that antidepressants and psychotherapy reduce depression symptoms in teens, and that most teens who are suffering aren’t diagnosed or treated. It said it still doesn’t recommend routine screens for younger children because there isn’t enough evidence to show that those same tests and treatments help them.

Another study in April's Pediatrics echoes the task force's findings, concluding that screening tests can accurately identify depressed teenagers. An estimated 5.9 percent of teen girls and 4.6 percent of teenage boys are depressed. An estimated 2.8 percent of children younger than 13 also are depressed, according to the task force. Depression increases the risk of suicide in people of all ages, and is the third-leading cause of death (after car accidents and homicides) in youth ages 15 to 24. One in every 100 to 200 suicide attempts in that age group is successful, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatricians ask teens about their mood, suicidal thoughts and sexual orientation (some gay teens have increased risk of depression and suicide) during routine physicals; the American Medical Association recommends screening of teens considered at risk of depression because of family or substance-abuse problems.

The task force isn’t trying to encourage more use of antidepressant medications, some of which have been linked to an increased risk of suicide, Ned Calonge, the task force chairman and chief medical officer of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, tells ScientificAmerican.com. "It would be a disservice if all we saw was screening followed by medication therapy," Calonge said this afternoon, adding that because they're associated with increased suicide risks, the meds should only be prescribed when teens can be monitored for suicidal behavior and also treated with psychotherapy.

Image © iStockphoto/Carlos Martinez

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe