Diabetics insulin-free after stem-cell transplants

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Patients recently diagnosed with type 1diabetes who received transplants of their own immune stem cells were able to go without insulin injections for nearly five years after the procedure, scientists report today.

In type 1 diabetes, the immune system attacks islet cells in the pancreas that the body depends on to make insulin, a hormone that converts glucose into energy. Treatment typically includes injections or infusions of insulin. Now, research in the new Journal of the American Medical Associationshows that the transplant technique — autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, in which a patient is infused with immune system stem cells from  his or her own blood — enabled 20 of 23 recipients to thrive without insulin injections for up to 58 months. Twelve were able to stay off insulin continuously, while the rest had to periodically receive treatment.

The scientists, from Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto in Sao Paulo, Brazil, reported in 2007 that the transplant patients were able to stay insulin-free for as long as a year and a half. At that time, critics wondered if the effect was genuine or reflected a kind of "honeymoon period" following the procedure.

The new research measured levels of C-peptides, a protein made by the same islet cells that manufacture insulin and that's considered a marker of the hormone. Two to three years after the transplants, patients had markedly higher C-peptide levels, suggesting that the transplant had effectively "re-set" their immune systems not to attack their islet cells, study co-author Richard Burt, chief of the division of immunotherapy at Northwestern, tells ScientificAmerican.com. Their ability to stay off insulin, he says, is "clearly an effect of the cells recovering and producing insulin, not just some honeymoon period or diet or exercise."

The procedure would likely work only within three months of patients being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, before their immune systems have destroyed all of their insulin-producing islet cells, Burt says. The next step is proving that the technique — which Burt says could cost up to $90,000 — works in a randomized controlled trial.

Because patients were transplanted with their own cells, they didn’t have to take anti-rejection drugs that other transplant recipients are prescribed to prevent them from reacting new cells. Side effects of the transplant included temporary hair loss, nausea, fever and sterility in some of the patients who had already gone through puberty. (Patients ages 13-31 and mostly male underwent transplants.) Younger patients who undergo the transplants in the future might be told to bank their sperm as a precaution, Burt says.

Scientists are also studying whether islet-cell transplants would effectively treat diabetes. That procedure would involve infusing a patient with a deceased donor's islet cells. Because those cells would come from another person, islet cell transplantation would require recipients to take anti-rejection drugs.

Insulin illustration/ David S. Goodsell, Scripps Research Institute and U.S. government via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe