Electrifying cars Down Under

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The alternative-energy automobile company known as Better Place plans to bring the same electric car system already in the works for Israel and Denmark to Australia. After raising $1 billion in capital—a tall order in today’s cold economic climate—Better Place founder Shai Agassi, a former software executive, Australian bank Macquarie and partners plan to build by 2012 electric car charge garages and battery exchange stations throughout Australia—all powered by wind turbines and other renewable resources (when possible)—to service the vehicles.

Basically, Better Place is trying to make electric cars—specifically the Renault-Nissan eMegane under development that can drive around 100 miles on one charge with a top power of 91 horsepower—work like cellphones. Customers would pay by the minute, er, mile, to use cars (powered by batteries and electricity) that they owned or leased. Customers would purchase mileage plans in order to use Better Place’s recharging stations and battery swaps. A123 Systems, a battery company in Watertown, Mass., will be the most likely battery provider, according to Agassi.

Ubiquitous charge spots would ensure at least 100 miles of driving range at all times. Plans call for at least 2.5 such Better Place spots for every electric car. But for those longer trips—say across the outback—there will also be places to swap out depleted batteries for fresh ones. Of course, it remains unclear how much any of this would cost.

There are around 15 million cars in Australia, a number that is dwarfed by the at least 62 million cars in the U.S. and the 38 million or so—and growing—in China. Yet Australians emit the most greenhouse gases per person—beating out tough competitors like the Americans—due mainly to their reliance on dirty coal power (although the current Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has pledged to derive 20 percent of power needs from renewables by 2020). The Better Place effort will initially focus on bringing the electric cars to  residents of the heavily populated east coast between Melbourne and Sydney.

Switching from oil to electricity for cars could bring down overall climate-change causing carbon dioxide emissions, even though Australia has experimented with carbon-light fuels. But to rein in global waming, the country would have to derive nearly all of its electricity from carbon-free sources, such as geothermal, nuclear, wind and sun. And the cars for this plan don’t exist yet: no one has built anything other prototypes. But Agassi is not worried.

“With our commitment to build infrastructure and the [Australian] federal government’s $500 million Green Car Innovation Fund," he said in announcing the Australian venture, "there is a compelling case for automobile manufacturers to jump in and build clean, safe, affordable electric cars for Australasia and Southeast Asia.” Who knows? Maybe some Australian city will become the Detroit of the 21st century?

Photo Credit: © Bjorn Kindler/istockphoto.com

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe