EPA reverses Bush ruling, grants California stricter emissions rules

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said today that it will let California set its own tailpipe emissions standards under a fresh interpretation of the Clean Air Act, The Los Angeles Times reports.

“This decision puts the law and science first,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a statement.

The announcement represents a compromise among the auto industry, environmental groups and the Obama administration. As a concession to automakers, the state has promised not to break from the federal standard until 2017. The new national requirement, approved in May, will require all new cars and trucks to get 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016.

Passed four decades ago, the Clean Air Act gave Calif. a “waiver” to petition the federal government for permission to impose its own benchmarks, but the Bush administration had denied the request.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told the Times that the ruling is a “huge step for our emerging green economy.”

Image courtesy of JayWalsh via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe