EPA to monitor air outside toxic schools

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Environmental regulators will measure the air quality outside 62 schools in 22 states, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today, following news reports that questioned whether schools located in "toxic hotspots" near large industrial facilities and in urban areas were safe for kids.

“As a mother, I understand that concerned parents deserve this information as quickly as we can gather and analyze it,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a statement. (Jackson, 47, is the mother of two sons.) “EPA, state, and local officials are mobilizing to determine where elevated levels of toxics pose a threat, so that we can take swift action to protect our children at their schools.”

Authorities will periodically sample air near the schools over 60 days and use  the results to decide whether more monitoring or crackdowns are needed. The monitoring will begin within 90 days, Jackson said, and will include tracking of acetaldehyde (a liquid used to make acetic acid that can cause irritation of the eyes, skin and respiratory tract); diisocyanates (used in the auto industry and to make building insulation that can cause and exacerbate breathing problems including asthma); metals (which can cause damage to the brain and other organs); Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (produced from burning coal and fuel, PAHs have been linked to cancer and fertility problems); Volatile Organic Compounds (emitted by paint, pesticides and cleaning supplies, VOCs can cause cancer, irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, headaches, loss of coordination, nausea and damage to the liver, kidney, and central nervous system); 4,4’-methylenedianiline (a chemical used to make insulation that may cause cancer and can cause skin irritation and liver damage); and Hexavalent Chromium (an ingredient in dyes, paints and plastics that can irritate the eyes, nose, throat, lungs and skin).

An investigation published in December by USA Today found that at least 435 schools around the country were located in areas where outdoor air was dirtier than the air surrounding an Ohio school closed four years ago after the EPA found that levels of cancer-causing chemicals there were 50 times higher than state standards. USA Today first reported on the EPA's move, which was sparked by the newspaper's investigation and the agency's own computer modeling, this morning. Click here for a list of the schools EPA will monitor.

Image © iStockphoto/Andy Medina

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe