Europe nixes controversial Turkish dam once again

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Germany, Austria and Switzerland are expected to withdraw financial support for Turkey's controversial Ilisu Dam. The two billion euro ($2.8 billion) dam threatened to flood Kurdish settlements and ancient archaeological sites, while starving Iraq and its endangered marshes of water.

The 1,200-megawatt dam would be the second-largest in Turkey and the dam site is situated on the upper Tigris river about 40 miles from the border with Iraq and Syria.  Dam plans first fell apart seven years ago when a private consortium of financiers and builders cited humanitarian and environmental concerns.

In 2006 the Austrian firm VA Tech Hydro put together a new consortium.  The governments of Germany, Austria and Switzerland promised export credit guarantees, a type of insurance policy, if Turkey lived up to 153 criteria, including monitoring biological impacts, protecting historic monuments, and ensuring that the 60,000 people affected by the dam were provided with resettlement options.

But human rights activists, archaeologists and even Turkish pop singers have campaigned against Ilisu and say that Turkey has not lived up to its end of the bargain. In late 2008, Europe suspended these export credit contracts for 180 days. Now, Frankfurter Rundschau reports that the contracts will be cancelled on July 6. Such a withdrawal would mark the first time that government export credit contracts have been cancelled for humanitarian and environmental reasons, according to the Environmental News Service.

Although Turkey lacks financial backing and engineering expertise to build the dam, it has said it plans to move forward.  The Forest and Environment minister wants to relocate the 10,000-year-old city of Hasankeyf to a "cultural park" and will begin building a new foundation on July 20, according to Hurriyet DailyNews.  However, just 25,000 euros ($34,945) have been allocated to protect the ancient city and its artifacts.

Image of Hasankeyf courtesy Senol Demir via Flickr

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe