Explorer 1 at 50

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Apparently, the engineers and scientists who launched America's first satellite partied as hard as they worked. They dressed up as outhouses for the masquerade ball and rolled on the floor with their bop. The mostly twentysomething team members at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory named their project after a card game and joked (?) about smoking pot to calm their nerves while waiting to hear whether their bird had flown or crashed.












Explorer 1, like Sputnik, was certainly a product of its age -- driven by Cold War rivalries, launched by a missile based on the Nazi's V-2, executed by guys who wore ties and used slide rules -- but it also ushered in a new age. People often comment on the economic benefits of space -- the buck for the bang -- but at least equally important are the conceptual benefits. Not just the other planets but also our own planet would have remained a cipher without the vantage point of space. The very idea of talking about our planet as a planet is a product of this. When so much of culture consists of dressing up old ideas in new packages, the scientific discoveries and human boundary-pushing of the Space Age inject some genuine novelty into our lives.


One of my favorite parts of the Explorer 1 mission is the rocket itself. The upper stages were mounted on bearings so that they could spin like a drill bit as they rose, stabilizing them. The satellite was simply the upper stage, and it reached orbit without any precise control. In fact, the engineers weren't sure exactly what its orbit was until they heard its signal by ham radio.


Our podcast this week has an interview with one of the engineers who worked on the project. Several good stories on Explorer 1 have appeared over the last few days,, especially in the LA Times. Last October, I wrote an article on the anniversary of Sputnik with more thoughts on the benefits of the Space Age and prospects for the future.


Although Explorer 1 burned up in the atmosphere in 1970, the Vanguard 1 satellite launched in March 1958 still buzzes over our heads. With patience and a good backyard telescope, you can see it for yourself. The orbital data are here and general advice about looking for satellites is here.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe