FDA approves next-gen female condom

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Public health advocates have long touted the female condom as a way for women to protect themselves against HIV, especially if their partner didn’t want to use a male prophylactic. But while the female condom has been distributed around the world over the last 16 years, it may make a bigger splash if it's cheaper. 

The polyurethane sheath, originally approved in 1993, costs anywhere from $2.80 to $4 a piece – a steep price for women in developing countries to whom the condom was marketed (never mind those in the U.S., who could pick up several of the male version for not much more than that — or for free), Reuters reports. That may change, now that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a next-gen female condom made of synthetic nitrile (a form of rubber) that costs less money for its manufacturer, the Chicago-based Female Health Company, to make. The cost of the new female condom, FC2, could fall to around 60 cents per device for health groups and government agencies that want to buy them, according to the newswire. Male condoms typically cost around 50 cents each.

"Having a less expensive Female Condom increases the probability of women who need it having access to it," Mary Ann Leeper, the company's senior strategic adviser, told Reuters after the FDA approved the FC2 on Wednesday.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The female condom is about 6.5 inches (17 centimeters) long, and basically works like a male condom, covering the cervix and opening with a ring that protects the outside of the vagina.

The United Nations has distributed the original female condom in 142 countries, Reuters notes. But some women have complained that it’s ugly and squeaks; even the product information recommends trying it three times before deciding whether to stick with it as a regular form of contraception. And while advocates have touted it as female-controlled form of sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention, a man still has to be on board, as the female condom’s outer ring is visible.

It could be a year or more before the new female condom is available at U.S. retailers, and its price hasn’t been set, Reuters notes.

Men and women, of course, still gripe about using protection, as we note in this look at the history of the male condom. That’s one reason scientists are trying to develop an effective microbicide – a kind of spermicide that women could apply before sex that would prevent them from catching HIV and other STDs. Then again, as far as contraception (but not disease prevention) goes, there's always the vasectomy — an increasingly popular option for men in these tight economic times, Reuters reports.

Version of female condom package/Anka Grzywacz via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe