First gray wolf legally killed in U.S. after nearly 40-year ban

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This summer, hunters in Idaho have snapped up nearly 11,000 tags that confer permission to hunt the 850 or so gray wolves that now live in the state thanks to a reintroduction program in the region started in 1995. Idaho—whose governor "Butch" Otter once vowed to be first in line for the permits—will allow 220 wolves to be killed for the bargain basement price of just $11.75; neighboring Montana will permit 75 starting September 15.

Gray wolves (Canis lupus), a close relative of domestic dogs, were nearly hunted to extinction in the western U.S. in the early 20th century, though they continued to thrive in Alaska. But the reintroduction scheme, started in Yellowstone National Park, has seen wolves fan out across the mountain Northwest.

All told there are now some 1,650 gray wolves living in 110,000 square miles of the northwestern Rockies—up from zero just 14 years ago—and they've become targets again thanks to this population rise and their predilection for livestock. A federal judge had postponed previous years' hunts but is still considering whether the wolves need to be returned to the Endangered Species List. According to the Billings Gazette, U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy speculates that a wolf hunt might provide wildlife managers with a better sense of the actual wolf population. So the hunt is on—and will last, barring judicial intervention, until the end of March next year.

Already the season's first wolf—a two-year-old female—has been killed near the Lochsa River by a 34-year-old real estate agent, according to the Associated Press. Whether such hunting helps manage the population—or eliminate it again—remains to be seen.

Image: Courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe