Food-borne illnesses hold steady in U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cases of food-borne illnesses, including infections such as salmonella and Escherichia coli that have been at the center of recent outbreaks, have held steady for the past four years, federal health officials said today.

Salmonella was the most common bacteria transmitted by contaminated food last year, according to today's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Rates of the infection, which has sickened 691 people and possibly killed nine in a recent outbreak via tainted peanut butter, have decreased the least of the nine illnesses that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) documents in the report.

The results are based on diagnoses of bacterial or parasitic illnesses from sites in 10 states, part of the CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), which began in 1996. Among the 18,499 infections recorded by FoodNet last year, 7,444 were salmonella, for a rate of 16.2 cases per 100,000 people. The other infections FoodNet tracked were Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora, Listeria, E. coli O157,  Shigella, Vibrio and Yersinia. All can cause diarrhea, cramping and fever. They were most common in kids younger than four and deadliest in people 50 and older.

Exactly why rates of food-borne illnesses have flattened isn’t entirely clear, Robert Tauxe, deputy director of the CDC's Division of Foodborne, Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases, said during a teleconference call today.  Rates declined from 1996 to 2004; the fact that they've leveled out since then reflects weaknesses in the U.S. food-safety system, Tauxe said.

More fresh produce has become tainted in the past decade than in years before, Tauxe said. In addition, increasing links in the food-supply chain (whether farms, manufacturers, processors, distributors or retailers) provide more opportunities for contamination, Stephen Sundlof, director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, said during the teleconference. 

"Our pathogens have complicated ecologies and may be changing," Tauxe said. "Our food industry is a complicated and changing arena, with different components and suppliers from all over the world. It's complicated and continuing and something I'm optimistic with coordinated efforts can be controlled in the future."

The salmonella outbreak (traced to peanut butter and paste from the Peanut Corporation of America) and other, recent high-profile outbreaks of that disease in jalapeno peppers as well as E. coli in beef and spinach, prompted President Obama in February to call for a review of  U.S. food safety practices. In recent weeks, pistachios and products containing them were recalled and the FDA warned consumers not to eat them after batches of the nuts were discovered to be contaminated. .

The agency also has hired 150 more inspectors, 32 additional scientists and safety officers and has distributed grants to six states (Florida, California, North Carolina, Minnesota, Michigan and Massachusetts) to set up "rapid response" teams that could check out local outbreaks of food-borne infections. "This plateau has to be addressed with a proactive, dynamic approach to protect American consumers," David Acheson, the FDA's associate commissioner for foods, said during the teleconference.

Low-temperature electron micrograph of E. coli/Eric Erbe and Christopher Pooley, USDA via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe