For your health, steer clear of the hospital on July Fourth weekend

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A word to the wise: stay out of the emergency room this long weekend.

The reason has nothing to do with the so-called July phenomenon—when a new crop of doctors in training arrive at your local hospital—and everything to do with alcohol, firecrackers, fistfights and reckless drivers.

July is the first month of the academic medical year, and marks the arrival of a new crop of medical residents and second-year med students taking their first crack at patients on the hospital floor. 

Although some have feared that the arrival of newbie docs would correspond with clumsy misdiagnoses and an increase in patient mortality, study after study has shown the July phenomenon is total bunk. “It’s good hypothesis that hasn’t really been born out by the empirical data,” says Gary Rosenthal, an internist at the University of Iowa in Iowa City and the Iowa City VA Medical Center, who has studied the question.

But July Fourth, like any holiday weekend, is still fraught with danger, says Shahriar Zehtabchi who works in one of the busiest emergency rooms in the country: Kings County Hospital in New York. “During summer holidays we get a lot of trauma patients,” he says, “Whether this is violence-related or car accidents or just kids falling off their bikes.”

“The already overcrowded emergency rooms are going to be extra-overcrowded not only because of the number of trauma cases but because a lot of clinics and private offices are closed,” he says.

Even patients who experience a possible heart attack, and are admitted for cardiac tests or angioplasty will end up waiting because many doctors will be on vacation. “It’s going to be long, long waits,” Zehtabchi says, and delays in care put “patients in danger.”

Image of hand courtesy pmarkham via Flickr

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe