Ford leans on consumer electronics as part of no-bailout strategy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


LAS VEGAS, NEV.—Ailing automakers are using every edge they can when it comes to selling their product, particularly as consumers hunker down for a lean 2009. Ford Motor Co. chief executive Alan Mulally said Thursday at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) here that one important part of his company’s strategy is to offer its Sync technology—an in-car communications and entertainment system that Ford and Microsoft announced at CES in 2007—on more cars. Sync—currently available on 12 different Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models, including the Ford Focus, Mercury Milan and Lincoln MKS—will be available across the company’s lineup by 2011.

Money has been tight for automakers, to say the least. Toyota Motor announced earlier this week that it will halt production at its 12

U.S. plants for six days in February and five days in March in an effort to cut costs. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler, LLC, late last year made now-infamous trips to Washington, D.C., to ask the federal government for billions of dollars in bailout funds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sync includes a flash memory-based system and lets motorists operate a number of popular digital devices, including MP3 players and mobile phones, using voice commands or buttons on the steering wheel or radio/navigation console. Ford expects to have one million Sync-equipped vehicles on the road by the third quarter of 2009, Mulally said. The company lists all of the Sync-equipped vehicles on its site.

The next version of Sync, due out this spring, will allow users to get traffic info, directions and other data using voice-recognition software, integrated GPS technology and a driver’s Bluetooth-capable mobile phone. The hope is that higher sales will keep Ford from needing the buyout billions, as Mulally has said his company does not plan to use federal aid.

Sync is a good deal for Ford, according to an analysis by tech research firm iSuppli, which estimates that Sync’s hardware components (excluding Microsoft’s software) cost Ford about $30 to add to each car, Tgdaily.com reported last year. Ford, however, offers Sync as a $395 option, quite a markup.

“We are a car company,” Mulally said Thursday, “but we’re learning to think like an electronics company.”

Image courtesy of Ford

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe