Ford leans on consumer electronics as part of no-bailout strategy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


LAS VEGAS, NEV.—Ailing automakers are using every edge they can when it comes to selling their product, particularly as consumers hunker down for a lean 2009. Ford Motor Co. chief executive Alan Mulally said Thursday at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) here that one important part of his company’s strategy is to offer its Sync technology—an in-car communications and entertainment system that Ford and Microsoft announced at CES in 2007—on more cars. Sync—currently available on 12 different Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models, including the Ford Focus, Mercury Milan and Lincoln MKS—will be available across the company’s lineup by 2011.

Money has been tight for automakers, to say the least. Toyota Motor announced earlier this week that it will halt production at its 12

U.S. plants for six days in February and five days in March in an effort to cut costs. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler, LLC, late last year made now-infamous trips to Washington, D.C., to ask the federal government for billions of dollars in bailout funds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sync includes a flash memory-based system and lets motorists operate a number of popular digital devices, including MP3 players and mobile phones, using voice commands or buttons on the steering wheel or radio/navigation console. Ford expects to have one million Sync-equipped vehicles on the road by the third quarter of 2009, Mulally said. The company lists all of the Sync-equipped vehicles on its site.

The next version of Sync, due out this spring, will allow users to get traffic info, directions and other data using voice-recognition software, integrated GPS technology and a driver’s Bluetooth-capable mobile phone. The hope is that higher sales will keep Ford from needing the buyout billions, as Mulally has said his company does not plan to use federal aid.

Sync is a good deal for Ford, according to an analysis by tech research firm iSuppli, which estimates that Sync’s hardware components (excluding Microsoft’s software) cost Ford about $30 to add to each car, Tgdaily.com reported last year. Ford, however, offers Sync as a $395 option, quite a markup.

“We are a car company,” Mulally said Thursday, “but we’re learning to think like an electronics company.”

Image courtesy of Ford

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe