Gene sleuths search for clues to tamoxifen resistance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For many women with breast cancer, tamoxifen, a drug that inhibits the hormone estrogen, can be a lifesaver.  

The medicine has been used for decades to fight breast cancers that need estrogen to grow--about 75% of all breast cancers. Unfortunately, breast cancer cells can sometimes become resistant to tamoxifen, a dismal development for patients.

How do the cancer cells do it? Sherene Loi of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Australia is looking for the genes that underlie tamoxifen resistance.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Loi’s group used a recently developed technique called Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to screen 246 different estrogen-triggered breast cancer tissues, 147 of which were tamoxifen susceptible and the remaining 99 tamoxifen resistant.  

GSEA acts like a librarian, cataloging genes into related groups or gene sets, allowing researchers to go straight to the DNA shelf of interest as opposed to thumbing through a jumbled pile of genetic data.

The group reported in the journal BMC Medical Genomics on their findings: 78 sets of related genes that act differently in tamoxifen-resistant tumors compared with those susceptible to the drug.

The next steps would be to determine the genes’ precise contributions to tamoxifen resistance. That knowledge could help researchers eventually develop new drugs to counteract resistance or even replace tamoxifen altogether.

Image of mammogram revealing a tumor courtesy of DoctorKan via iStockphoto

 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe