Gene sleuths search for clues to tamoxifen resistance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For many women with breast cancer, tamoxifen, a drug that inhibits the hormone estrogen, can be a lifesaver.  

The medicine has been used for decades to fight breast cancers that need estrogen to grow--about 75% of all breast cancers. Unfortunately, breast cancer cells can sometimes become resistant to tamoxifen, a dismal development for patients.

How do the cancer cells do it? Sherene Loi of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre in Australia is looking for the genes that underlie tamoxifen resistance.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Loi’s group used a recently developed technique called Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to screen 246 different estrogen-triggered breast cancer tissues, 147 of which were tamoxifen susceptible and the remaining 99 tamoxifen resistant.  

GSEA acts like a librarian, cataloging genes into related groups or gene sets, allowing researchers to go straight to the DNA shelf of interest as opposed to thumbing through a jumbled pile of genetic data.

The group reported in the journal BMC Medical Genomics on their findings: 78 sets of related genes that act differently in tamoxifen-resistant tumors compared with those susceptible to the drug.

The next steps would be to determine the genes’ precise contributions to tamoxifen resistance. That knowledge could help researchers eventually develop new drugs to counteract resistance or even replace tamoxifen altogether.

Image of mammogram revealing a tumor courtesy of DoctorKan via iStockphoto

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe