Gore challenge: 100 percent renewable power in 10 years

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Former vice president Al Gore today challenged the U.S. to go from getting more than half its electrical power from greenhouse gas-spewing coal-fired power plants to getting all of it from 100 percent carbon neutral sources in a decade. In other words: eliminate fossil fuels for electricity, until the greenhouse gases can be captured and buried, in favor of nuclear, solar, wind and geothermal.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



In a plan he explicitly likened to President John F. Kennedy's “moon shot,” Gore called in a speech (transcript) for a national grid to link wind power in the Dakotas with cities to the east and west, improved energy efficiency, taxes on carbon dioxide, and even plug-in electric cars, though there were few details on how to pay for this ambitious transformation.

Gore is not the first to express this kind of ambition. The Apollo Alliance of business, labor and environmental groups was founded in 2004 for the same purpose, and leading scientists, such as Stephen Chu of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have made similar arguments. It is, however, the first time it has been advocated by such a prominent figure as the former politician, climate campaigner and Nobel laureate.

Gore explicitly called on "every candidate, at every level, to accept this challenge" and "move beyond empty rhetoric." Otherwise, he said, "the survival of the United States of America as we know it" and even "the future of human civilization" is at risk.

Democratic Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama said in reaction to the speech that he strongly agreed and would invest in "solar power, wind power and advanced biofuels" but did not pledge his commitment to the plan. Nor did Republican Presidential candidate Senator John McCain though, according to the AP, he said he believes it's "doable."

But the challenge isn't just aimed at politicians. What do you think?

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe