Gray wolf returns to endangered list in northern Midwest

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After just a couple months off the endangered species list, the gray wolf in the western Great Lakes is back to “threatened” status. A government reversal, not a sudden drop in the 4,000-plus wolf population, put the animals back on the protected list, the Associated Press reports.

The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, which manages the endangered list, removed the wolves in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin in early May for the first time since they were placed under federal protection 35 years ago.

But the agency neglected to get public comment before making the change, prompting a lawsuit from a handful of environmental groups. A settlement will reverse the removal.

“We hope that the Fish & Wildlife Service will honestly assess the scientific information it previously refused to review,” said Nicole Paquette, senior vice president of Born Free USA, an animal protection nonprofit, according to the Green Bay Press Gazette.

State and federal agencies maintain that the wolf populations have recovered from past overhunting. They will continue to press for removal of the wolves from the protected ranks.

“We need the flexibility to properly manage wolves and address them preying on livestock and pets,” a spokesperson for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The state department estimated that wolves were responsible for killing 21 dogs and 43 farm animals last year.

Image courtesy of dallidee via Flickr

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe