Hacker targets Twitter to teach the company a lesson in security

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When computer programmers find security flaws in the programs they use (particularly software running on the Web), they have a choice: report the glitch to the software maker (which may ignore the warning) or find some way of publicly (and often illegally) exploiting it to make clear to the company how vulnerable its software is. A 17-year-old hacker claiming to be from Brooklyn, N.Y., this past weekend chose the latter path, unleashing at least two worms after discovering a weak spot in the social network site Twitter; the worms wended their way into a reported 190 user accounts and infected about 10,000 tweets (messages sent via the Twitter network), the company said yesterday.

A teen identifying himself as Michael “Mikeyy” Mooney has claimed credit for the cyber attacks, Net News Daily reports. (The site even posted a transcript of an interview reportedly conducted via a chat with Mooney shortly after the strikes began.) The first worm sent tweets to Twitter users inviting them to join the StalkDaily.com Web site. When tweeters visit the site, their computers become infected and automatically send out tweets enticing others to visit the site. (Warning: Do not visit this website, because it may trigger an infection in your computer, according to American News World).

A second worm sent out the messages: "Twitter please fix this, regards Mikeyy" and "Mikeyy is done." Mooney told Net News Daily that he had identified a security loophole in Twitter's site about a week ago and decided to "fiddle" with it out of "boredom." Mooney acknowledged that he could go to jail for his actions, but insisted his only intent was to alert Twitter to a programming flaw. (He doesn't mention whether he ever tried to flag the problem simply by contacting Twitter.)

Twitter said on its blog that it's still investigating what happened and how but that "no passwords, phone numbers, or other sensitive information was compromised" during three separate attacks on Saturday and Sunday. During interviews with Brooklyn-based BNO NEWS and Net News Daily, Mooney said he had no intention to rip off Twitter users' personal info.

Online watchdog Watshit offers the following advice for tweeters eager to protect their accounts: Do not use the same password for your Twitter account and e-mail; that way, your e-mail will be protected if your Twitter account is compromised (and vice versa).

Image ©iStockphoto.com/ Sami Suni

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe