“Handouts for Hummers” runs out of bucks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Cash for Clunkers, the program that Sen. Diane Feinstein (D–Calif.) has pejoratively referred to as “Handouts for Hummers,” has likely blown through its $1 billion budget in its first official week. The funds, which provided $3,500 or more for Americans trading in old cars that got less than 18 miles per gallon for new ones with better gas mileage, were expected to last until November

Thursday night, White House Press Secretary Roberts Gibbs said the program had not been suspended, but the government was working “to assess the situation...auto dealers and consumers should have confidence that all valid...transactions that have taken place to date will be honored.”

As of this morning, car dealers reportedly are still not sure how much, if any, of the $1 billion will remain in government coffers once the Department of Transportation tallies up its figures. The bill gives consumers $3500 vouchers if they purchase vehicles with a 4 mpg improvement over their trade-ins, and it gives them $4500 if they purchase vehicles providing a 10 mpg improvement.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We hope there's a will and a way to keep the program going a bit longer," General Motors said in a statement. "Any doubt that the program would jump-start auto sales is completely erased."

In a June editorial in the Wall Street Journal, Feinstein and Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R) complained about how their original Cash for Clunkers proposal was a win–win for the environment and the economy but was soon hijacked by Detroit auto industry lobbyists who helped author a rival bill. The House approved the latter legislation, which would subsidize the purchase of a new Hummer H3T that gets just 16 mpg, along with other gas-guzzling vehicles.

In a joint statement released yesterday, Feinstein, Collins, and Sen. Charles Schumer (D–N.Y.) suggested that an extensions of the program should have a fuel economy requirement at least two mpg higherthan the original program and include vouchers for fuel efficient used vehicles. “We believe that any extension of the ‘Cash for Clunkers’ program must go further in advancing the goals of better fuel efficiency and greater emissions reductions. We will not support any bill that does not meet these goals.”

The clunkers pictured above, courtesy raffa080808 via Flickr, would probably not qualify for the program

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe