Harder than a diamond? Survey says...

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to being the traditional token of marital intent, the diamond has long provided the—ahem—gold standard for super-hard materials. But physicists at Shanghai Jiao Tong University and at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, say that two lesser-known materials, wurtzite boron nitride and lonsdaleite, are even harder.

Wurtzite boron nitride, the researchers calculate, resists indentation with 18 percent more fortitude than its glittering counterpart, whereas lonsdaleite, a hexagonal lattice of carbon atoms also known as hexagonal diamond, boasts indentation strength a whopping 58 percent greater than that of diamond. That would be a new record for hardness, the team claims in the study, published this month in the journal Physical Review Letters.

There's a catch to the claims, however: both materials are quite rare, and the assessment of their hardness was determined by calculations rather than physical demonstrations. Natalia Dubrovinskaia, a crystallographer at the University of Bayreuth in Germany, told the New Scientist that although the new work is important, it remains unproven until the materials can be physically isolated and tested.

In a 2004 open letter to the materials science community published in Nature Materials, Dubrovinskaia and an international team of colleagues cautioned against making claims of "harder than diamond" materials. The letter's authors specifically cite the pitfalls of basing such proclamations on simulated models of material structure, which might ignore real-life impurities or other subtleties: "The relationship between the computed microscopic behavior of these materials and experimental measurements of their bulk properties, such as hardness, strength, toughness and abrasion resistance, is less than clear."

Diamond photo by Mario Sarto via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe