Homebuilt plane crashes into a house near Las Vegas, killing three

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


An experimental, build-it-yourself Velocity 173 RG aircraft crashed into the living room of a house in Las Vegas Friday morning shortly after takeoff from the North Las Vegas airport, killing the pilot and two people inside the home, the AP reports. The pilot and one resident of the house died at the crash site, while the other died after being taken to University Medical Center in Las Vegas. The names of the victims have not been released.

The AP reports the Velocity that crashed was certified for flight by the FAA in 2002. The Velocity—which costs between $55,000 and $150,000 depending on the kit—is constructed in sections and can be dismantled by removing about 10 bolts and some screws. The maximum width of the fuselage, without the wings attached, is 12 feet.
 
The Velocity's body is made from fiberglass and can be built without power tools, such as spray guns, sanders, saws, or an air compressor, the company's Web site says. Even with a larger engine, the company's recommended load is about 1,100 pounds (with 70 gallons of fuel on board, that leaves 580 pounds for passengers and luggage). The more the plane is weighted down, the more runway it needs for takeoff and landing.

The company's Web site claims it has "never had any type of structural failure in the Velocity." The site further says that most of the accidents or incidents in the Velocity are "of the fender bender variety where a small amount of damage and no injuries occur" but still encourages builders to have their aircraft checked at a Velocity facility prior to the first flight.

The Velocity's crash comes less than two weeks after a homebuilt Titan Tornado ultralight aircraft—capable of hitting 90 mph—crashed into an oncoming car after landing on the highway near San Bernardino County’s Mojave Valley. The pilot successfully executed an emergency landing onto the roadway but collided with the car when he tried to take off again.

(Image courtesy of Velocity, Inc.)

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe