House passes FDA tobacco regulation bill

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The House today approved a bill that would for the first time give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate tobacco products.

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Henry Waxman (D–Calif.), passed by a 298-112 vote, culminating a nearly decade-long battle by anti-smoking advocates to grant the FDA regulatory power over the industry. The bill, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, would empower the agency to approve or nix new products and bars companies from adding fruit and other flavors to cigarettes that critics say are aimed at attracting—and hooking—young smokers.
                                       
Sen. Edward Kennedy (D–Mass.) said he’ll introduce a companion measure in the Senate when Congress returns from a two-week recess on April 18. Kennedy and Waxman have been pushing Congress to grant FDA authority over tobacco since the Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that the agency lacked such power without congressional action. Their effort began after former FDA Commissioner David Kessler (who led the agency from 1990-1997) forced Big Tobacco to admit its products were addictive and then tried unsuccessfully through proposed regulations to grant the agency the very power that the Waxman measure would now give it. (Kessler has not responded to requests for comment on today’s vote, but we'll update you if we hear back.)

The Senate passed a similar bill five years ago, but at least one senator from a tobacco-producing state, Republican Richard Burr of North Carolina, is threatening to filibuster this legislation, the Wall Street Journal reports. (The House passed a package to give the FDA power over tobacco last year, but the Senate didn’t take it up for a vote.) President Obama has said he supports the measure.

Image by SuperFantastic via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe