House to vote on tobacco-regulation bill

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


House members are expected to approve a bill tonight that would authorize the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate cigarettes and other tobacco products.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), would require the FDA to approve any new tobacco products before they're marketed, and would ban artificial and natural flavoring of cigarettes, other than menthol and tobacco. Critics say candy and fruit-flavored cigarettes were designed to appeal to kids, and the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between the tobacco industry and 46 state attorneys general barred companies from marketing them with an eye toward getting minors hooked on smokes despite laws that prohibit their sale to anyone under 18.

The legislation wouldn’t, however, allow the FDA to ban cigarettes, cigars, tobacco or smokeless tobacco products. It also wouldn’t allow the agency to require manufacturers to reduce their products' nicotine levels to zero.

The measure has 178 co-sponsors and President Obama, who's struggled with his own smoking habit, supports it, Reuters reports. The Senate passed a similar measure five years ago.

Critics have complained that the bill isn’t stringent enough, noting that menthol cigarettes are disproportionately popular among African Americans. They also say that Philip Morris, the only tobacco manufacturer backing the legislation, would secure its market dominance if the bill passes because the FDA probably wouldn’t approve any new tobacco products, according to the New York Times.

To execute its mandate under the measure, the FDA would have to set up a Center for Tobacco Products, funded, according to the Times, by up to $712 million a year from the tobacco industry. FDA observers are speculating that President Obama's nominee to head up the FDA, Margaret "Peggy" Hamburg, will oversee food and tobacco regulation and her deputy, Joshua Sharfstein, will manage drugs, biotech and medical devices. Hamburg is awaiting Senate confirmation.

Image by AH!Photography via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe