House votes to let offshore drilling ban expire

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A 26-year moratorium on offshore drilling will expire on Wednesday, after the House approved a temporary-spending package today sans a planned extension of the ban. The bill was approved by a 370-to-58 margin, hours after the Democratic majority nixed a provision that would have maintained the prohibition on drilling off the U.S. coast line.

The measure is likely to be approved by the Senate within a few days, the Associated Press reports. President Bush had threatened to veto the package if it extended the ban.

Democrats backed away from their longstanding support of the drilling limit over the summer, after fuel prices skyrocketed and consumer discontent over the surging costs became a top issue on the presidential campaign trail. Both candidates support offshore drilling; Republican John McCain wants drilling allowed on the Outer Continental Shelf, while Barack Obama backs offshore drilling if it's accompanied by development of alternative energy sources.

It's not clear whether oil companies will capitalize on the expiration — or if drilling offshore can really make the U.S. fuel independent. A separate energy package approved by the House last week would allow drilling 50 to 100 miles from the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. But much to the chagrin of the industry and Republicans, that legislation would also scrap $18 billion in tax breaks for oil companies.

(Image of oil rig from iStockphoto, Copyright: S. Greg Panosian)

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe