How NASA plans to quell Ares 1 rocket vibrations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The last thing you want on a flight to the moon is a headache.

That's why NASA engineers have been working to figure out how to reduce vibrations predicted to occur in the Ares 1 rocket, a multi-stage launch vehicle that plays an early role in the space agency's Constellation program to return to the moon by 2020.

NASA plans to field the Ares 1 in 2015, using it to launch the Apollo-like Orion crew capsule into orbit (left). But engineers believe that combustion in the rocket's solid-fuel motor would likely set up vibrations across both vehicles for a few seconds during the ascent. These "thrust oscillations" could injure astronauts or make it hard for them to see the controls and respond to emergencies.

In a teleconference this morning, NASA project managers described their plan to limit the vibrations to one-quarter of a g force (the force of gravity on Earth). More than that, they said, and vibrations can affect vision and speech similar to the way a jackhammer might.

Part of the plan is to add 16 adjustable spring-mounted weights or actuators to the aft skirt—the flared structure at the bottom of the rocket that shields it from exhaust. The idea is that sensors would monitor the vibrations and adjust the position of these 100-pound weights to reduce the shaking.

The second proposed fix is a shock-absorber-like ring between the rocket's first and upper stages.

NASA managers said the system would reduce the payload capacity of Ares 1 by 1,200 to 1,400 pounds. But they said they wouldn't have to cut any critical systems because they had 8,000 pounds of excess lift capacity to play with.

The total cost of the Constellation program is estimated at $230 billion over 20 years.

Image credit: Lockheed Martin Corp.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe