Hubble hopes pinned to tricky remote-control reboot

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Hubble Space Telescope has had a long and illustrious run, helping to pin down the age of the universe and pointing the way to the existence of dark energy. But that run may be halted if engineers can’t switch some operations over to backup units.

A formatter on the satellite’s Science Instrument Command and Data Handling (SIC&DH) unit failed last month, and today NASA began the process of switching over operations to the components on a backup formatter, most of which have not been powered up since Hubble’s 1990 launch.

Since the September 27 failure, Hubble has been largely incapacitated, as the SIC&DH component that failed, the Science Data Formatter, handles many key activities, including routing data and commands on board the satellite and relaying science information back to Earth.

Switching over to the redundant side of the SIC&DH, which contains the backup Science Data Formatter, is being performed by ground-based engineers, and NASA expects to have Hubble back in operation on Friday. (Six related backup components will also need to be brought online by that time.) Art Whipple, manager of Hubble’s Systems Management Office at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, expressed confidence to the Associated Press but cautioned that “it's obviously a possibility that things will not come up.”

Late Wednesday afternoon, Susan Hendrix, a spokesperson for Goddard, told ScientificAmerican.com that the engineers were “about halfway there.” She said that some indication of the changeover’s success would come around midnight, when the backup units “will be talking to the ground” if all goes well.

NASA will send up a replacement unit when the space shuttle Atlantis launches next year, Hendrix said. The shuttle, which had been slated to depart for a Hubble-servicing sojourn this month, saw its launch date pushed back when the telescope fell silent in September.

 CREDIT: NASA

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe