Hubble hopes pinned to tricky remote-control reboot

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Hubble Space Telescope has had a long and illustrious run, helping to pin down the age of the universe and pointing the way to the existence of dark energy. But that run may be halted if engineers can’t switch some operations over to backup units.

A formatter on the satellite’s Science Instrument Command and Data Handling (SIC&DH) unit failed last month, and today NASA began the process of switching over operations to the components on a backup formatter, most of which have not been powered up since Hubble’s 1990 launch.

Since the September 27 failure, Hubble has been largely incapacitated, as the SIC&DH component that failed, the Science Data Formatter, handles many key activities, including routing data and commands on board the satellite and relaying science information back to Earth.

Switching over to the redundant side of the SIC&DH, which contains the backup Science Data Formatter, is being performed by ground-based engineers, and NASA expects to have Hubble back in operation on Friday. (Six related backup components will also need to be brought online by that time.) Art Whipple, manager of Hubble’s Systems Management Office at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, expressed confidence to the Associated Press but cautioned that “it's obviously a possibility that things will not come up.”

Late Wednesday afternoon, Susan Hendrix, a spokesperson for Goddard, told ScientificAmerican.com that the engineers were “about halfway there.” She said that some indication of the changeover’s success would come around midnight, when the backup units “will be talking to the ground” if all goes well.

NASA will send up a replacement unit when the space shuttle Atlantis launches next year, Hendrix said. The shuttle, which had been slated to depart for a Hubble-servicing sojourn this month, saw its launch date pushed back when the telescope fell silent in September.

 CREDIT: NASA

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe