I-slate: Electronic chalkboards being developed for students in developing nations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In many rural areas of India, schoolchildren use chalk to write on handheld, erasable black slate tablets roughly the size of a piece of paper, because their teachers lack the funding or electrical infrastructure for anything more sophisticated. A group of humanitarians and educators are trying to change this by developing a new type of solar-powered LED tablet, called the I-slate, that uses a stylus rather than chalk and features a special chip that uses up to 30 times less electricity than a standard computer chip.

Although it sounds counterintuitive, particularly in an educational setting, the I-slate's brain—its information processing chip—is expected to conserve energy by using probabilistic logic, which provides answers to calculations that are rounded rather than precise. (Most chips rely on Boolean logic in their circuits to ensure computers will perform calculations with the utmost precision). These probabilistic chips aren't lazy; they do just enough work to get the job done.

"It's a system of design that factors in human thinking," where the mind is able to fill in the blanks even when it isn't given all of the information available, Krishna Palem, a Rice University computing professor and head of the I-slate project, said yesterday at a panel discussion in New York City commemorating the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' (IEEE) 125th anniversary. As an example, one of the slides in Palem's presentation included the question, "CAN YOU USTNNDERAD THIS STNECNEE?" The goal is to use the human brain's capacity for interpretation to help in the design of less expensive technology, he added.

Chips in most computers, cell phones and other electronics are made using complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology. But  the I-slate (which would be roughly the same size as its  chalk counterpart) would use a probabilistic version called probabilistic complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (PCMOS). PCMOS chips are expected to be best suited for applications such as powering the I-slate's display or running streaming video on small screens (such as a cell phone), where picture clarity isn't as important as the message itself.

Palem and his team, which includes doctoral candidate Lakshmi Chakrapani (who helped him develop the system's probabilistic logic), are working with the International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT) in Hyderabad, India, to develop a visually based mathematics curriculum that allows children to learn by doing, regardless of their grade level or whether they have a full-time teacher. Rice and IIIT (working with the Indian nonprofit Villages in Development and Learning Foundation) hope to begin testing prototype I-slates within a year in classrooms in southern India's Mahboobnagar District.

Images © Rice University

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe