IBM and Caltech experiment with DNA-size computer chips

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Gadget makers have for decades relied on ever-shrinking microchips to make more portable, yet more powerful, devices. But as the components used to make these chips become smaller, with widths measured in dozens rather than hundreds of nanometers, they become increasingly more difficult to assemble. 

Since microchips are the engines performing the logic functions that make computers, cell phones and countless other electronic gadgets run, technology makers like IBM have been looking to pack more transistors closer together in smaller spaces. 

Now comes a potential solution. IBM Research and the California Institute of Technology researchers say they may have found a way to control the placement of silicon nanowires, carbon nanotubes and other tiny components on microchips through the use of synthetic DNA and tiny lithographic templates. The scientists used the DNA molecules to function as scaffolding, to help deposit millions of nanosize particles in precise patterns, according to a study to be published in the September issue of Nature Nanotechnology . ( Scientific American is part of the Nature Publishing Group). The templates help the nanoparticles hold their shape.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the DNA is folded into certain origami-like structures, it might even possible to place components six nanometers apart (even thinner than a cell membrane), whereas conventional semiconductor fabrication techniques are struggling to reach placement closer than 22 nanometers (a number thought to be out of reach just a few years ago).

DNA origami is created by using hundreds of short DNA strands (also called "staples") to fold much longer genetic ribbons into nanoscale shapes and patterns. Some researchers think that DNA origami proves microscopic material can be controlled to form specific objects, including smaller circuits.

Technology makers are looking for ways to keep pace with Moore's law, an observation by Intel co-founder Gordon Moore in 1965 that the number of transistors placed on an integrated circuit doubles every two years. The cost to continually shrink electronic components to improve performance is a limiting factor in keeping pace with Moore's law and "a concern across the semiconductor industry," Spike Narayan, manager for science and technology at IBM's Almaden Research Center in San Jose, Calif., said in a prepared statement. IBM seeks better ways to assemble microchip components at the nanoscale without the need to replace existing chip-making technology.

There is a downside to this in that smaller components create more complexity and require some way of dissipating heat before it destroys the surrounding circuitry.

Of course, IBM and other tech companies have some time to work this out: the company says it will be at least a decade before its DNA microchips are ready for the market, according to the Guardian UK .

Image of triangular DNA origami adhering to a template © IBM

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe