Is China's pollution a problem for the U.S.?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You may have read some alarming stories recently about pollution making its way from China to the U.S. Should you worry?

In fact, a cloud of soot, sulfur dioxide and sand from China’s Gobi Desert does make it to cities of the western U.S., where it accounts for, by some measures, as much as 15 percent of local air pollution. Of course, air pollution that doesn't respect international boundaries is nothing new: the rain acidifying the lakes of eastern Canada comes from the U.S., for example.

But China is doing something about the problem, thanks to very real impacts on public health and even children's development, as we note in our recent in-depth report on China and the environment. Whether it's having one of only four cities worldwide to go carbon neutral, cleaning up indoor air by burning human waste, or pushing renewable energy, the Middle Kingdom has a host of efforts underway. Of course, there's still a growing love of cars to deal with as well.

The National Academies of Science is currently digging into the question of what impact all this pollution will have on the U.S. But one thing is clear: as much as one-third of China's pollution comes from making goods for the U.S. market. You can outsource manufacturing to developing countries with more lax environmental standards, but the pollution will still come back to you. There's only one atmosphere after all.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe