Judge scraps lawsuit over Large Hadron Collider

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A federal judge has tossed out a case challenging the operation of the world's biggest particle acceleratornot that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is running, anyway.

Judge Helen Gillmor of the U.S. District Court in Hawaii dismissed the lawsuit Friday, saying the American judicial system has no jurisdiction over the $8-billion LHC, which is housed in a circular tunnel straddling the Swiss-French border. The New York Times is reporting on the dismissal today.

The suit was filed by a retired radiation safety officer, Walter Wagner, and Spanish science writer Luis Sancho, MSNBC's Cosmic Log has previously noted. The two claimed that the operator of the LHC, the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), and its backers failed to show that smashing protons at nearly the speed of light wouldn't produce mini black holes that could obliterate Earth.

Sancho, for his part, isn't entirely disappointed in the ruling. "The lawsuit was an unbelievable success in that it put the collider issue on the intellectual agenda," he told the Times, adding that it pressured CERN to conduct a safety study it wouldn’t have done otherwise. "The study was not perfect, but at least the safety factors on which CERN is relying are not quite as bad," Sancho said.

A spokesman for CERN, James Gillies, says Sancho's characterization of its safety research is "absolute nonsense." The agency conducted two formal reviews in 2003 and 2007, before the suit was filed in March.

"We were not pressured into doing that," Gillies says. "Safety review is part of our routine activities and predates the court case by some way. We said all along there was no scientific basis for the case and we're glad the court in Hawaii sees it that way."

Physicists and engineers plan to use the LHC to learn more about conditions that preceded the formation of the universe. But the machine had been running for only two weeks after its September 10 launch when CERN announced it would be shut down for repairs and a scheduled winter maintenance that will put it out of commission until at least spring.

To learn more about the LHC, take a look at our in-depth report.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


(Image of LHC Atlas beampipe/CERN)

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe