Kansas county creates a refuge for snakes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


“Save the snakes” is not a rallying cry you often hear.   

But Johnson County in northeast Kansas recently voted to preserve a nine-acre site for the sanctity of the northern redbelly snake and the smooth earth snake, the Kansas City Starreports.  

The snakes are considered a threatened species under Kansas wildlife protection laws.  So, the new reserve was set aside as part of a mitigation plan associated with the construction of a wastewater treatment plant that infringed on the snakes’ forest habitat in the Kansas river corridor.  Snake expert Joseph Collins of the Center for North American Herpetology in Lawrence says he's been doing a lot of environmental assessments in the county because of rapid growth of Kansas City, Missouri. "When you cut the forest down, you no longer have habitat," he explains .


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kansas has been a stronghold for herpetology ever since globetrotting snake wrangler Edward Taylor started beefing up the specimen collection at the University of Kansas Natural History Museum in Lawrence in the 1920s. Then, frog expert William Duellman joined the program in 1959, and, today, Rafe Brown is carrying on the tradition discovering record numbers of frog, snake, and lizard species in the Philippines and Indonesia.   Collins was also on the faculty from 1968 to 1997.

Back in the 1920s, protecting the slithering beasts seemed like a pretty wacky idea. “Far-fetched as the idea may sound,” Allen Samuel Williams of Reptile Study of America told the New York Times as the first snake protection bills were being introduced in New Jersey and New York, “snakes have a very real bearing on the cost of living ... Did you know that one small snake will eat from three to five mice a week?”

The newly protected snakes in Kansas, however, eat only snails and earthworms.  

For a look at other unlikely conservation poster children, check out Scientific American’s slideshow of the world’s ugliest endangered species.

Image of red-bellied snake courtesy Suzanne Collins at the Center for North American Herpetology

Brendan Borrell is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. He writes for Bloomberg Businessweek, Nature, Outside, Scientific American, and many other publications, and is the co-author (with ecologist Manuel Molles) of the textbook Environment: Science, Issues, Solutions. He traveled to Brazil with the support of the Mongabay Special Reporting Initiative. Follow him on Twitter @bborrell.

More by Brendan Borrell

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe