Lifesavers: NOAA pushes better air, land and sea rescue beacons

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Boaters adrift at sea, wayward hikers and stranded pilots take note: the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is taking steps to speed up rescues. As of next week, NOAA's COSPAS Search and Rescue Satellite Aided Tracking (SARSAT) system, perched high above Earth's atmosphere, will home in on digital (as opposed to analog) distress signals sent using a particular frequency, instead of wasting time trying to sort through an array of signals with the urgent ones potentially getting lost in the shuffle.

Digital distress signal transmitters using the 406 MHz frequency (which cost between $200 and $1,500 and are installed on aircraft and boats or are handheld) are more powerful and transmit a more accurate signal than their analog predecessors.

The COSPAS-SARSAT system, which the agency says played a key role in saving 283 lives in the U.S. last year, picks up aviation, maritime and individual distress signals from beacons (owners must register his or her transmitter with NOAA, which stores it in a federal database) and relays the information to the U.S. Air Force (which carries out land rescues) or the Coast Guard (which conducts rescues at sea). As of January 15, NOAA had assisted five rescues this year. In 2007, the agency lent assistance saving 353 lives.

Among the 2008 NOAA-assisted rescues: two boaters near Port Aransas, Tex., whose vessel broke down with waves as high as 12 feet (3.7 meters); an injured hiker who used his personal locator beacon in a remote area near Hemet, Calif. (mountain lions had been spotted nearby); and a pilot whose Cessna plane crashed into trees about 70 miles (112.7 kilometers) southeast of Galena, Alaska.

The federal government since 1973 has mandated all U.S. aircraft to carry an emergency locator beacon programmed to automatically activate after a crash and transmit a homing signal. This followed the 1972 disappearance of Rep. Nick Begich (D–Alaska), then House majority leader Rep. Hale Boggs (D–La.), and two others when their twin-engine Cessna 310 crashed in a remote region of Alaska but was never found. Although the beacons were originally monitored from the ground, the U.S., Canadian, French and Soviet governments in 1979 launched COSPAS-SARSAT to track these beacons via satellite and put NOAA in charge of running the system.

Images courtesy of NOAA

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe