Mars Lander was way popular on Twitter, Facebook

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Like many an unsung artist or writer, the late Mars Phoenix Lander's fame has increased since the robot expired last week — thanks to social-networking tools that gave it a human voice.

The Phoenix amassed nearly 40,000 friends on Twitter and almost 4,000 fans on Facebook courtesy of a NASA spokeswoman who sent cheeky transmissions from the robot as it slowly froze to death on the Red Planet, the Arizona Daily Star reports today. "Not everyone gets the chance to read their own epitaph(s). So many great entries, I feel so loved :-)," the Phoenix "told" Twitter users on Nov. 5, five days before NASA declared it caput (but three days after it stopped communicating with the agency).

Human interest surged when NASA spokesperson Veronica McGregor began penning replies to Web queries about the space bot. "A lot of the perkiness really developed as the result of the types of questions I was getting back," McGregor told the Star. "And once I started writing in first person, immediately people started writing back and responding."

On Thursday, one Facebook fan lamented the demise of the anthropomorphic Phoenix this way: "Goodbye … I'd give you a hug if you weren't 120,000,000 miles away." Another wrote, "i'm gonna miss you little buddy :(." A third declared, "Goodbye brave little Phoenix!"

For its part, the Phoenix was philosophical about its inevitable end after working for five months on Mars, verifying the presence of ice water below the planet's surface and snapping 25,000 pictures. That was a necessary attitude for the robot to convey to its devoted fans, McGregor said. "They did get very emotionally attached, much more so than I expected," she told the newspaper. "So I spent some time trying to brace them for the loss."

"One of the most common questions I'm asked is whether I knew going in that this mission would cost me my life," she wrote on Gizmodo on Election Day. "The answer to that is yes, of course, and there's not a single robotic explorer in our solar system that doesn't know it faces the same fate. Unlike all of you, most of us can't go home again."

But going to its final resting place on Mars, the Phoenix (er, McGregor) wrote then, is "a heck of a better place to be than locked in storage."

Illustration of Mars Phoenix Lander by NASA/JPL/UA/Lockheed Martin

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe