January 28, 2009

Meet the whiz kids: Intel Science Talent Search announces finalists

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

Students from New York City and its suburbs again took an outsized number of finalist slots in the annual Intel Science Talent Search, according to results released today.

Started in 1942 as the Westinghouse Science Talent Search, the contest identifies 40 top high school science students, based largely on independent research projects. Winners (who can earn up to $100,000) will be chosen once the finalists gather in Washington DC for interviews in March.

Longtime Intel/Westinghouse fixtures Stuyvesant High School and the Bronx High School of Science in the city had two finalists apiece, but Ward Melville in Long Island also produced two finalists. Three other New York state schools (John Jay High School, Smithtown High School West, and Roslyn High School) also chipped in to produce nine finalists for the Empire State. Only California, with five finalists, came close.

These whiz kids took part in typical after-school activities. You know, one "used graph theory to create a tri-color truncated icosahedron." Another "designed and synthesized a novel tumor-targeting conjugate drug for cancer treatment that she believes represents a new generation of chemotherapy agents." If you want to follow along, you can do so, fittingly, on Twitter and Facebook.

Followers of the expanding high school research prize circuit will also note a few familiar names on the list. Wen Chyan of the Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science won the $100,000 top individual prize in the Siemens Competition in December, and a few, including Christine Shrock (Ward Melville) and Philip Streich (homeschooled), were named Davidson Fellows in August by the Davidson Institute for Talent Development.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

For more on where finalists end up, see our weekly "Where Are They Now" series.

Photo of the 2008 Intel Science and Engineering Fair winners by Ivan Oransky, copyright Scientific American

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American