Mixing memory with reality can bring pleasure to the routine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Contrary to conventional wisdom, you can get too much of a good thing. A favorite song can get downright annoying after a few dozen listens, and a preferred lunch can become old hat if packed too many times.

Could simply recalling other tunes, or meals, bring back your original enjoyment? Some recent research suggests this kind of “virtual variety” might just do the trick.

The stakes might be higher than you think. “Satiation is a real problem,” says Jeff Galak, a marketing professor at Carnegie Mellon University and the lead author of the study published recently online in the Journal of Consumer Research. “If we stop enjoying the things we enjoy, we’ll be forced to find the next best thing. And if that continues in perpetuity, we’ll never be happy with what we have.”

Previous research has suggested that preferences depend in large measure on what we remember, but that our internal record keeping is typically incomplete and imbalanced. We tend to forget the variety in our lives. Maybe a little manipulation of our memories could reduce this “variety amnesia.”

To test the theory, Galak and his team conducted three experiments, each addressing different categories of things which can grow tiresome: people, music and food.

In the first experiment, the researchers found that people were more eager to hang out with a close friend after thinking first about socializing with other friends.

In the second, participants listened to a favorite song 20 times—enough to make them sick of it. Three weeks later, those who recalled hearing other songs during the intervening weeks regained significantly more enjoyment of the original tune.

The last experiment replaced songs with a variety of jellybeans, from green apple to licorice. As expected, a preferred flavor tasted better to participants who recalled eating other beans after the initial study-induced satiation.

So thinking about something else you like might enhance the perception of an old standby. Galak suggests this “simple manipulation” could be applied to “anything giving pleasure over time,” whether that’s intimate relationships or peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

He also sees the potential for this technique to be applied to jobs where monotony can lead to error, though he can’t prove it just yet. A worker would need multiple tasks to think about to “reset the level of boredom,” he explains. Of course, if a task was dull to begin with, the room for improvement is minimal. “We can make it less boring over time,” says Galak. “But we’ll probably never make it as enjoyable as chocolate or a movie.”

Photo by 3bugsmom via iStockphoto.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe