More hot air on climate change from world leaders?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


President Obama gave his first major speech on climate change today at the United Nations, part of a special session convened by U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. The reason for the session? Lack of speed in international negotiations to address climate change.

You can see the president's speech here:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In addition to reaffirming the U.S. commitment to addressing climate change, the president listed some recent accomplishments: new efficiency standards for all vehicles, billions of dollars for renewable energy development, and the nation's first mandatory greenhouse gas reporting system. He even noted a plan to work with the world's other largest economies, known as the G20, to "phase out fossil-fuel subsidies so that we can better address our climate challenge."

What the president couldn't point to was actual legislation to restrain greenhouse gas pollution. That's because the existing climate bill is stalled in the U.S. Senate and may languish until after an international deadline to agree to a new global treaty to combat climate change, due in Copenhagen this December.

"What we are seeking, after all, is not simply an agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. We seek an agreement that will allow all nations to grow and raise living standards without endangering the planet," Obama said. "If we are flexible and pragmatic, if we can resolve to work tirelessly in common effort, then we will achieve our common purpose:  a world that is safer, cleaner, and healthier than the one we found; and a future that is worthy of our children."

Mere moments later, China's president Hu Jintao promised to curb carbon intensity—a measure of greenhouse gas pollution per economic unit produced and a favorite climate metric of the Bush administration—by a "notable margin" from 2005 levels by 2020. And the country has set ambitious growth targets for energy from renewable resources, such as wind, solar and hydropower. At the same time, China will not commit to binding targets for reducing its growing greenhouse gas pollution levels—a stance known as "common but differentiated responsibilities" for developed and developing nations (and notably backed by India and other heavyweights of the developing world).

In other words, the leaders of the world's two largest emitters continued to make vague promises that, so far, have not been backed by significant actions. U.S. emissions may have come down by nearly 9 percent since 2007 but that is largely thanks to the Great Recession and only in part due "to steps that promote greater efficiency and greater use of renewable energy" as Obama put it.

After all, as the president of the Maldives noted in his speech, which was sandwiched between those from leaders of the two leading greenhouse gas polluters, he gets asked every year or two to explain the threat posed by rising sea levels thanks to climate change that his island country faces. And every time business as usual continues: "We know deep down, you aren't really listening." Can we hear him now?

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe