Move over Gustav: Hanna delays Space Shuttle move

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


To the folks at NASA, Hanna is the new Gustav. They're putting off transporting the shuttle Atlantis to its launch pad as the newly hyped tropical storm makes its way toward the southeast coast of the United States.

Atlantis was supposed to be moved to its launch pad at the Kennedy Space Center this morning, but NASA spokesman John Yembrick says it won't make the journey until Thursday at the earliest.

Yembrick says the shuttle is expected to lift off as scheduled in October  for a Hubble Space Telescope service visit as long as the move happens by this coming weekend.

"It is possible we may have to move it a couple days, depending on when the payload gets to the pad," he says. "If it gets there by Sunday, we should be OK for an Oct. 8 launch, but we'll have to assess that once we're out there."

Gustav, a Category 2 hurricane that's now a tropical depression, tore roofs off of homes and flooded streets in New Orleans, which is still recovering from Hurricane Katrina three years ago.  The city's shored-up levees and floodwalls withstood Gustav, but the storm shattered windows and cut power in Mississippi and smaller coastal  towns in Louisiana.

Gustav was the first of four tropical  tempests traveling through the Caribbean toward the Gulf Coast, according to the National Hurricane Center.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image of Caribbean-region storms courtesy NOAA

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe