Nano-coated bullets could help solve gun crimes

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


U.K. researchers are developing a coating for bullet casings that sticks to the hands (or gloves) of anyone handling it and is very difficult to remove. The idea is to give each bullet a "fingerprint" that can be traced to a given crime.

Today, cops rely on generic gunpowder, primer and lubricants getting on the shooter's hands and clothing when a bullet is fired. Such techniques can tell when someone has fired a gun, but can't tie a shooter to a specific bullet casing.

The new coating is made from chemicals infused with nano-sized particles 30 microns in diameter (one micron is one millionth of a meter).

Each coating can have a slightly different chemical composition to give it a unique signature that can help establish a link between a fired cartridge and a shooter, according to University of Surrey chemistry professor Paul Sermon, who led a team of colleagues from other universities with more than $743,000 in funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the U.K.'s main agency for funding research in engineering and the physical sciences.

In addition to the coating, the researchers are also experimenting with bullet casings made with a micro-patterned pyramid texture able to retain dead skin cells--and with it, DNA evidence--from a thumb as it loads a cartridge into a firearm. Law enforcement has a difficult time extracting DNA or prints from bullet casings due to their smooth, shiny surfaces. Generally, efforts by law enforcement in the U.K. to use DNA evidence from gun cartridges are only successful about 10 percent of the time, according to Sermon.

Sermon says both the nanotag and DNA capture technologies could be available for use within a year, adding that he and his team are currently focusing on understanding the precise requirements of the police and cartridge manufacturers.

Of course, gun violence in the U.S. is a whole different animal. Whereas England's Home Office reports a total of 21,521 offenses involving firearms committed in England and Wales in 2005 and 2006, the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics' National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) in 2005 reports that 477,040 victims of violent crimes in the U.S. stated that they faced an offender with a firearm.

 

*Image courtesy of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe