February 23, 2009

Nanosong breaks down the miracle of the miniature--With puppets

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Quick: What is nano? Can you answer in three minutes or less?

The American Chemical Society (ACS) is challenging the public to do just that, in video form. They're asking people to come up with short films in reply to that question, preferably informative and entertaining ones. (One could be literal and just say nano is a prefix meaning one billionth, but that doesn't make for a very engaging three minutes.) Two cash prizes of $500 are up for grabs—one for the critic's choice, as selected by ACS staff and expert judges, and one for the people's choice, as determined by user votes.

Patrick Bennett and Ryan Miyakawa, grad students in the Applied Science and Technology program at the University of California, Berkeley, took the Sesame Street approach in their submission. "Nano Nano," which found its way onto the blog Boing Boing this morning, illustrates the principles of nanotech and some of its promise in a musical combining live action and puppets. (Bennett directed, Miyakawa wrote the music, and other Berkeley students and staffers chipped in as well.)

Topics covered include: nanotubes, space elevators, quantum dots, and how to win over dour puppet monsters who are skeptical of nanotech's appeal.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American