NASA contractors battling it out over space suits, shuttle

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The battle for juicy NASA contracts is heating up as the space shuttle nears retirement in 2010 and work continues on the Constellation program to replace it.

NASA announced on Friday that it's terminating a potentially $745 million contract with Oceaneering International, Inc. of Houston to make new space suits (left) for Constellation, which is supposed to return us to the moon by 2020.

Exploration Systems & Technology, Inc., a competitor for the contract, filed a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) after NASA awarded it on June 12 to Oceaneering.

"NASA looked at the protest and determined there was some corrective action needed," agency spokesperson Grey Hautaluoma told SciAm.com. The protest is under a GAO "protective order," Hautaluoma added, which means NASA can't say anything more.

According to Reuters, NASA officials wrote in a letter last week that the agency had not asked Oceaneering to disclose its "cost accounting standards." The letter said NASA plans to hold "limited discussions" about new proposals with Oceaneering and United Technologies Corp., whose Hamilton Sundstrand unit has been NASA's primary space suit contractor since 1981.

The conflicts go beyond space suits. The Orlando Sentinelreports that a "potentially damaging legal dustup" has broken out between Alliant Techsystems Inc. (ATK), the company building the new Ares rocket, and United Space Alliance (USA), NASA's main contractor for the space shuttle.

According to the Sentinel, USA filed suit Friday alleging that ATK defrauded the shuttle contractor and violated a long-term contract between the two by poaching engineers from USA.

The Sentinel cited unnamed industry sources worried that the legal battle could delay a test flight planned for next year of the Ares I-X rocket, a smaller version of the Ares I. USA also claimed that ATK's hiring of skilled shuttle workers could endanger the final 10 shuttle flights.

More on Ares I tomorrow in a NASA teleconference that is supposed to address concerns that the rocket as designed could shake itself apart—along with the Orion crew module perched atop it—during liftoff.

Related: Could the Russia-Georgia conflict jeopardize U.S. space plans?

 

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image credit: NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe