NASA's embattled inspector general steps down

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


NASA inspector general Robert "Moose" Cobb submitted a letter of resignation yesterday, giving up his post effective April 11. President Barack Obama has accepted Cobb's resignation, according to the space agency, ending his nearly seven-year run as NASA's top watchdog.

Cobb had endured criticism of his performance for years. In 2007 a panel created by the President's Council on Integrity and Efficiency, investigating dozens of complaints over the preceding years, concluded that Cobb had abused his authority, creating a hostile workplace peppered with aggressive outbursts and profanity. (The committee report, available here as a pdf, makes for great reading—one witness cited in the document said that Cobb was fond of referring to his staff as "f—sticks.") The panel also found that Cobb had grown too close to the agency personnel he was supposed to be auditing for waste and fraud. For instance, the inspector general lunched often with NASA brass, golfed with the agency's then chief Sean O'Keefe twice, and once tipped O'Keefe off that search warrants in "a significant criminal investigation" were about to be issued.

In a December report, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, Congress's investigative arm, found that Cobb had managed to save NASA only 36 cents for every dollar budgeted to his office. The average return for the 30 such watchdogs across all federal agencies was $9.49—more than 26 times the figure attained at NASA.

In March, a bipartisan trio of senators (Democrats Claire McCaskill of Missouri and John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia and Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa) called for Cobb's ouster, asking Obama to "take immediate action to put an end to conflict of interest and cronyism ... by replacing Mr. Cobb and nominating a qualified candidate." That request followed a similar letter sent to the president a month earlier by two Democratic congressmen, one of whom, Rep. Bart Gordon of Tennessee, yesterday called Cobb's resignation "a good first step." Photo of Robert Cobb courtesy of NASA

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe