Nature's climate talks, or is the web a climate savior or climate doom?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[Re-posted from Greenery & Other Fine Things to Look At] You don't have to fly all the way to Bali to participate in some form of climate negotiation, you merely need an avatar and the ability to teleport him, her or it to Second Nature, the Nature journal's archipelago in Second Life. They're hosting a series of chats, including one with George Monbiot, archdruid who wants us all to stop flying immediately among other parts of the climate change plan outlined in his book Heat (an intriguing read). He'll be popping by (I wonder what his avatar looks like) next Thursday, December 13. All this begs the question of how much energy goes into creating a Second Life avatar. Nature soothes its conscience by noting that it is less than an American household uses in three days. But, as I have written before, these avatars do consume more energy than an average person in the developing world. Still, if Second Life could be employed to avoid face-to-face meetings of international dignitaries it might actually serve a purpose other than a rendezvous point for those who enjoy corporate branding schemes, electronic widgets and the ceaseless flow of electronic dollars. The whole energy-web question comes down to which perspective you want to take on it. In as much as the internet enables the paperless office, telecommuting, virtual meetings, what have you, then it is a massive energy boon. In as much as it is an entirely new infrastructure consuming ever more energy on vast server farms, energy primarily derived from burning coal, you have a massive energy nightmare. Courtesy of EcoGeek I guess I have yet to see that paperless office... But, hey, who am I to cast stones, living as I do off of electronic screeds like this one? Still, what's sad is when all that energy is burned for little purpose.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe