New superbug making kids sick despite vaccine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A new superbug that causes meningitis and pneumonia in kids has public health officials worried: Serotype 19A of the Streptococcus pneumoniae bacterium eludes most antibiotics and a vaccine intended to prevent infection.

Rates of meningitis, pneumonia and bloodstream infections from the dangerous strain have increased from 2 in 100,000 children in 2001 to more than 10 per 100,000, the New York Times reports today. At the same time, life-threatening infections among the elderly have gone up fourfold, the newspaper notes.

The eight-year-old Prevnar vaccine inoculates infants and toddlers against seven strains of the bacteria that caused 70 percent to 80 percent of pneumococcus infections in the '90s, and within two years of its 2000 introduction, rates of those illnesses had fallen by 80 percent in some places. But the four-shot series never protected against serotype 19A, and now its manufacturer, Wyeth, is racing to develop a next-gen shot against that and five additional strains, the company's head of vaccine research and development, Emilio Emini, told the Times.

Health authorities said the vaccine isn't to blame for the rise in resistant strains of the bacteria. Still, the phenomenon suggests that Prevnar may have to be updated like the flu shot, the Pharmalot blog noted in a post last year about a surge in ear infections from serotype 19A. Scientists make new flu vaccine annually, based on the strains they guess will be most common in a given year.

(Image by iStockphoto/Carmen Martínez Banús)

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe