NIH director Zerhouni resigns

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is leaving the agency, he announced today, marking at least the second departure of a scientist from the Bush Administration in the last 24 hours.

Elias Zerhouni says he'll depart the NIH at the end of next month to write. His announcement on the NIH Web site, follows yesterday's resignation of Conrad Lautenbacher, chief of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Both were long-time Bush appointees, Zerhouni having served for six years and Lautenbach for seven.

"It's with mixed emotions that I move on," Zerhouni, 57, said in a press conference today, according to The Scientist, adding that he doesn't "have a job lined up."

Though he opposed limits on federally funded stem-cell research, it wasn’t until last year that Zerhouni split with President Bush and told Congress that the Bush administration ban on research that used embryonic lines created after Aug. 9, 2001 should be lifted.

"It is clear today that American science will be better served and the nation would be better served if we let our scientists have access to more cell lines," Zerhouni said then.  "It is very clear from my point of view that the current cell lines will not be sufficient to do the research we want to do…. It's not possible for me to see how we can continue the momentum of science and in stem cell research with the lines we currently have."

Zerhouni cracked down on ethics violations at NIH, including its researchers' membership on the boards of blockbuster pharmaceutical companies. He also backed a plan to use robots to test some toxic compounds instead of animals.

(Image of Elias Zerhouni by NIH)

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe