April 6, 2009

North Korea claims successful rocket launch, others disagree

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

The North Korean government is touting a controversial rocket launch this weekend as a success, despite indications that it crashed into the Pacific Ocean and never made it into space.

North Korean state media claims the launch, condemned by the U.S. as a missile test in violation of United Nations sanctions, carried an "experimental communications satellite" into orbit as part of the development of the country's space program. The satellite "is sending to the earth the melodies of the immortal revolutionary paeans 'Song of General Kim Il Sung' and 'Song of General Kim Jong Il,'" according to the Korean Central News Agency.

But international observers aren't buying it. The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) reported that "North Korea launched a Taepo Dong 2 missile at 10:30 p.m. EDT Saturday," but that the top stages of the missile, along with whatever payload it carried, fell into the Pacific Ocean. South Korean Defense Minister Lee Sang-hee seconded that assessment, according to the Japanese Kyodo news agency, telling a parliamentary session that "nothing has been put into orbit."

North Korean coat of arms via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American