Obama calls on doctors at AMA meeting to set aside fears and support health reform

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After proposing $313 billion in cuts to providers of health care this weekend, President Obama took the stage at the American Medical Association’s (AMA) annual meeting in Chicago today to reassure doctors and ask for their backing of his plan to remake health care.

It was the latest stop on Obama’s campaign for health reform and the first time a president has addressed the AMA since Ronald Reagan in 1983.

To trim wasteful spending, Obama suggested changing payment of doctors and hospitals to reward quality over quantity of care.

But many doctors fret that cuts and a proposed government-run insurance option could hurt their livelihoods. “Now, I know there’s some concern about a public option,” Obama told the doctors. “In particular, I understand that you are concerned that today’s Medicare rates will be applied broadly in a way that means our cost savings are coming off your backs.” 

While calling the concerns “legitimate,” Obama said they could be overcome by rewarding best practices over the “current piece-work reimbursement.” He also said he wouldn’t push a single-payer system.

The president called for greater spending on preventive care, a switch to electronic medial records, a reduction of medical school costs for students and scrutiny of the effectiveness of treatments.

The price of the $2-trillion-a-year health care system, which Obama called a "ticking time bomb," is poised to consume 20 percent of individuals' salaries within 10 years. "For all this spending," he said, "the quality of our care is often lower, and we aren't any healthier."

He applauded the AMA's efforts in teaming up with others in the health-care industry to cut $2 trillion in spending over the next decade and received standing ovations himself from the gathering of doctors. But the hall quieted—and a few people booed—when he argued against caps on malpractice awards, saying they “can be unfair to people who’ve been wrongfully harmed.”

Read coverage from 10 years ago about rising health care costs.

Image of Obama at a 2007 presidential forum on health care courtesy of the Center for American Progress Action Fund via Flickr

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe