Obama Interior pick, Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar, an environmental question mark

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Environmentalists are worried that President-elect Barack Obama’s pick for Interior secretary is too cozy with oil and mining interests and isn’t committed enough to conservation.

Obama yesterday named first-term Colorado Sen. Ken Salazar, a Democrat, to head up the department, which regulates U.S. natural and cultural resources.

"I will do all I can to help reduce America's dependence on foreign oil,” Salazar said yesterday at a Chicago press conference where Obama introduced him as his pick. Salazar added that he hoped to “take the moon-shot on energy independence” as Obama develops a combination of green and traditional sources of energy, including wind, coal and natural gas, according to the New York Times.

During his four years in the Senate, Salazar, 53, supported expanding offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, but opposed opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration. Salazar in 2007 won approval for a measure that required an extra year of environmental-impact study before the Bureau of Land Management issued its final rules on oil shale exploration, which involves crushing and heating rock to extract fuel. Oil shale development is still a commercially speculative idea, and is controversial because its production releases more climate-change causing greenhouse gases than regular oil. After the bureau released its rules last month, Salazar complained that allowing the practice would threaten his state's water supply.

Salazar, meantime, failed to persuade the Bush administration to lease the Roan Plateau — a region in Western Colorado believed to hold 8.9 trillion cubic feet (252 billion cubic meters) of natural gas — in separate stages, rather than in one fell swoop, the Washington Post reports. (In August, the administration leased more than 54 million acres on the plateau to energy companies for nearly $114 million.)

"He's been supportive of public lands energy development, but he thinks it needs to be done responsibly and protect the other uses out there," Dwayne Meadows, a field representative for the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, told the Post. "He didn't say, 'Don't drill the Roan Plateau,' but, 'Make sure you protect hunting and fishing recreational uses as well.'"

Salazar was chief of Colorado’s natural resources department from 1990 to 1994 and served as the state’s attorney general from 1990 to 2005. Industry groups like him because, among other things, he pushed for legislation (still pending) that would limit the liability of mining companies that clean up abandoned mines.

“Nothing in his record suggests he’s an ideologue,” Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, told the Times. “Here’s a man who understands the issues, is open-minded and can see at least two sides of an issue.”

But Daniel Patterson, southwest regional director of the enviro group Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, charged that he's in the pocket of industry. 

“It’s no surprise oil and gas, mining, agribusiness and other polluting industries that have dominated Interior are supporting rancher Salazar," Patterson, a former official of the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management, told the Times. "He's their friend."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image of Sen. Ken Salazar/U.S. Senate

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe