Peanut-allergic kids helped by desensitization

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Kids with severe peanut allergies were able to eat the food after building up their tolerance with a daily dose of peanut flour, British doctors report today.

By the end of a small, six-month study of four boys, the children were able to eat up to five peanuts a day — not so many that they could safely sit down to a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, but enough that they didn’t need to worry about accidentally swallowing peanut ingredients hidden in other foods, according to research by Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge in the journal Allergy.

"You wouldn't want to say it's a cure because it's not that and gives people false hope," says Wesley Burks, a professor of pediatrics at Duke University on whose protocol the British study was modeled. But, "As long as you use the treatment, the disease is better."

More research is needed on larger numbers of kids to tease out who can tolerate the treatment and who can't, says Scott Sicherer, an associate professor of pediatrics at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, who was not involved in the study. And once it was clear who could tolerate the treatment, studies would still need to test it on kids eating real peanut products, instead of just those who were accidentally exposed to peanuts.

"The real trick is, have you treated the allergy in a permanent way, or created a higher threshold?" he says. "If they have accidental exposure to peanut, if by giving some dose every day to keep them used to it, that’s a benefit. [But] If they miss a few days of medicine, then they might have a reaction if it's not getting rid of it but covering it up."

Some 40 children are being treated with the technique at Duke and Arkansas Children's Hospital. Of the 10 kids who have been followed for more than 30 months, half have been able to stop the therapy and are able to eat peanut products, deliberately or as ingredients in other foods, Burks says. (That research hasn’t yet been published.)

More than 3 million people in the U.S. report being allergic to peanuts, tree nuts or both, according to the American Academy of Allergy and Immunology. For unknown reasons, their prevalence doubled in children between 1997 and 2002. (Skeptics say the extent of the problem is overblown but that avoidance of peanuts may paradoxically lead to more cases.) In severe cases, patients can experience anaphylaxis, which causes the throat to close up, effectively choking them.

Doctors previously have tried treating peanut allergies with injections like those used against hay fever, but those programs were tabled after patients suffered severe, systemic side effects, including hives, wheezing and vomiting, Burks said. It's not fully understood why the peanut flour treatment may work better than shots for peanut allergies, but any medication taken by mouth is less likely to cause a reaction than one given through an IV or a muscle injection, and the dose is increased much more slowly, Burks notes.

In general, food allergies have proven harder to treat than environmental allergies, possibly because they begin earlier in life, he said. (Then, of course, there’s the other health problem peanuts have been linked to lately: salmonella.)

The new report "is exciting," Sicherer says, but, "this is not something to try at home."

Image © iStockphoto/Klaudia Steiner

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe