Peanut butter may be to blame for salmonella outbreak

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The source of the salmonella outbreak that has sickened 399 people in 42 states since September may be peanut butter, Minnesota health officials said Friday. The Washington Post reports that the officials found salmonella in a five-pound container of King Nut brand creamy peanut butter. The product is sold to "long-term care facilities, hospitals, schools, universities, restaurants, delis, cafeterias and bakeries, but is not sold retail in grocery stores."

King Nut, of Solon, Ohio, said in a statement yesterday that it was recalling all of its peanut butter manufactured by Peanut Corporation of America, of Lynchburg, Va., including the Parnell's Pride brand.

Labs are now trying to confirm whether the strain, or serotype, found in the peanut butter—Salmonella typhimurium, the most common type found in the U.S.—is the one infecting people around the country.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A moderator of ProMEDmail, an e-mail alert that monitors emerging infectious diseases around the world, suggested that the peanut butter was as likely a cause as any. "It appears that the 'smoking' peanut butter has been found," wrote Larry Lutwick, the director of infectious diseases at the VA Health Care System in Brooklyn and a professor of medicine at the State University of New York, Downstate, also in Brooklyn. However, he cautioned, "confirmation is awaited."

Peanut butter was the source of a 2006-07 outbreak that sickened more than 600 people in 47 states. In 1996, it caused an outbreak in Australia. Slate's Daniel Engber wrote about how salmonella gets into peanut butter in 2007.

The best way to keep salmonella out of peanut butter is strict hygiene at plants. But scientists have studied how to make sure any salmonella that does manage to get into peanut butter is killed, Lutwick notes in his post. The good news: Fewer bacteria survive if the peanut butter is heated to 21 degrees Celsius (about 70 degrees Fahrenheit) in the manufacturing plant than do at 5 degrees C (41 degrees F), according to a 2000 study. The bad news: A 2006 study found that heat treatments "are inadequate to consistently destroy Salmonella in highly contaminated peanut butter and that the pasteurization process cannot be improved significantly by longer treatment or higher temperature," according to Lutwick.

Map of current salmonella outbreak by the CDC. Click here for a larger version.

 

Ivan Oransky is editor in chief of Spectrum and a distinguished writer in residence at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute. He is a co-founder of Retraction Watch and a volunteer member of the board of directors of the PubPeer Foundation.

More by Ivan Oransky

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe