Perchlorate found on Mars makes soil less Earthlike

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Martian soil may be less Earthlike and less hospitable to life than researchers believed.

NASA's Phoenix Mars Lander has found traces of perchlorate in two soil samples analyzed during the past month, the space agency announced today. The results appeared to be the same ones rumored this weekend by AviationWeek.com to have been seen by the White House and to reflect Mars's habitability for life.

Perchlorate, or ClO4, is a naturally occurring and man-made chemical that is the primary ingredient in solid rocket fuel, according to the EPA. Where such a contaminant might have come from is unclear. The fuel in the thrusters that Phoenix used to land on Mars was made of hydrazine, not perchlorate.

The presence of such a chemically reactive compound in Martian soil would seem to make that soil less supportive of life. Here on Earth, high doses of perchlorate can interfere with thyroid hormone production, which can harm babies in the womb.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Phoenix's MECA wet chemistry experiment detected the chemical. NASA said the Phoenix team was waiting for the craft's gas analyzer, TEGA, to confirm the finding. The agency said that results from a TEGA experiment on Sunday, which analyzed a sample take from directly above the soil's ice layer, did not detect perchlorate.

"This is surprising since an earlier TEGA measurement of surface materials was consistent with but not conclusive of the presence of perchlorate," Peter Smith, Phoenix's principal investigator at the University of Arizona, Tucson, said in the NASA statement.

NASA said the team is also working to confirm that the chemical was not a stow-away from Earth that crept into the instruments or the samples. The agency said it would provide further information tomorrow afternoon.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe