Plan B must be available to 17-year-olds, too, judge rules

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Drug regulators must make the morning-after pill available over the counter to girls as young as age 17, a federal judge in New York ruled yesterday, suggesting that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) consider making the medication accessible to younger girls, as well.

U.S. District Judge Edward Korman said the FDA has 30 days to comply with his decision. He said that delays in approving the drug, Barr Pharmaceuticals’ Plan B, for non-prescription sale were “repeated and unreasonable,” and that the agency's decisions about the drug, including limiting it to women 18 and older, were “arbitrary and capricious.”

The FDA approved the over-the-counter sale of Plan B in 2006 after years of political haggling and the resignation of its director of women’s health, Susan Wood, who quit in protest over what she said was the politicization of the issue.

The Center for Reproductive Rights in New York sued the FDA in 2005 for allegedly holding the drug to a different safety standard than other meds. Its president, Nancy Northrup, said yesterday in a statement that the ruling “is a tremendous victory for all Americans who expect the government to safeguard their health, not undermine it. The court recognized that the FDA favored politics over science, ideology over women’s health, and violated the law in the process.”

But conservative groups slammed the ruling. “An activist judge has ordered that minor girls have access to this drug without medical oversight or parental knowledge,” Wendy Wright, president of the right-leaning policy group Concerned Women for America, said in a statement. “Minor girls need permission to go on a field trip, get a piercing, or in some states use a tanning booth. But now, by one judge’s order, girls will be encouraged to rely on an ineffective drug without medical oversight or parental involvement.”

Plan B is a high dose of birth-control pills that, if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus. Korman noted in his decision that the medication is available without a prescription or age restrictions throughout much of the world, “including virtually all industrialized countries.”

FDA spokesperson Rita Chappelle said this afternoon that the agency is reviewing the decision.

Updated at 4:45 p.m. March 24 with FDA comment.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image © iStockphoto/Emiliano Rodriguez

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe