Polio resurgent in Nigeria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The number of cases of polio last year climbed – and spread into countries where it was previously wiped out — despite an aggressive worldwide effort to eradicate the potentially paralyzing virus in the nations still battling it half a century after the introduction of the polio vaccine.

An estimated 350,000 cases of the disease occurred annually in 1988, when world leaders launched the Global Polio Eradication Initiative to eliminate the virus in the 125-plus countries where it still existed. By 2006, polio remained endemic to just four countries – Nigeria, Afghanistan, India and Pakistan – and by 2007, the number of reported cases was down to 1,315. But over the next year, infections rose by 26 percent, to 1,655 cases, according to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).

The biggest jump was in Nigeria, where there were 801 cases last year, up from 285 in 2007, according to the MMWR. As we noted in January, the northern part of the country is plagued by flawed vaccination campaigns that miss up to half of the children that require them. (The oral vaccine is given at birth and in three subsequent doses over a child’s first year.) The report says these lapses contributed to the disease’s spread to six countries — Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Mali and Togo — where polio had been eradicated as well as to Niger and Chad, which had been battling resurgences of the virus.

The situation in Nigeria is "a reflection not so much of something getting worse but of things not getting better," Steven Wassilak, a medical epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tells ScientificAmerican.com. Vaccine campaigns are "not well enough planned or executed so they miss 40 percent of children in the very core of the infectious area. So as children are born who don’t get vaccine or enough doses, you get a buildup of [susceptible] children entering the population."

Politics also plays a role in polio's persistence. Some Nigerian states banned the vaccine between 2003 and 2005 amid unfounded rumors that it was contaminated with HIV or would cause sterility. "It's hard to undo rumors completely, even if you have more and more leaders talking about the safety of the vaccine," Wassilak says.

There were 559 cases of polio in India last year, down from 874 the year before; 118 in Pakistan, compared to 32 the previous year; and 31 in Afghanistan, versus 17 in 2007. Polio persisted in India because children living in crowded areas and already weakened by diarrhea and malnutrition may not have been able to mount a strong immune response, according to the report. The virus continued to spread in Afghanistan because anti-government activity in the South prevented children from receiving the vaccine, CDC virologist Mark Pallansche tells ScientificAmerican.com, and in parts of Pakistan, he says, organizational problems and lawlessness in tribal areas interfered with kids being inoculated. 

In January, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Rotary International and the British and German governments committed to $630 million to eradicate polio.

Image of child receiving polio vaccine/USAID via Wikimedia Commons

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe